Monday, July 12, 2010

Lawsuits From Unseen Patients

There is only one thing worse that receiving notice of a medical malpractice claim being filed against you - being served a claim when you never saw or treated the patient!

You can thank history for this anomaly. The basis of vicarious liability dates back to the feudal times of "masters and servants". It basically holds the "master" liable for the actions of the "servants". It is similar to the "deep pocket" strategy of attorneys. Since the servant seldom had the capability to compensate the victim, the master's pockets were deeper and better able to provide compensation.

There are numerous occasions where this principle of vicarious liability can come into play:


  • You could be held liable for the actions of an employee within your organization.

  • You could be held liable for the actions of a contractual partner within your practice or group.

  • You could be held liable for the actions of an ostensible partner - a situation where there is no written contract, but the relationship is perceived to be a partnership.

  • You could be held liable for the actions of a medical provider that simply rents space within your facility.

This concept of vicarious liability also extends beyond medical malpractice. As an employer, you could find yourself liable for the actions of one co-worker against another. If an employee is injured by another employee, the employer could be held vicariously responsible for the co-worker's actions, rather than the co-worker directly.

Another unseen patient situation could arise from an informal consult. A simple discussion with another doctor over lunch about the treatment of patient could be considered an informal consult. In a malpractice lawsuit, such informal consults are treated equally with formal consults. Even such casual conversations, likely to surface during discovery motions by a plaintiff's attorney, can create a doctor-patient relationship and duty to the patient.

Claims resulting from unseen patients are not that unusual. And they are not limited to vicarious liability and informal consults. Consider the treatment of your patients for dangerous communicable diseases. If a patient under your treatment infects an unknown person, they could sue you and win - if you fail to advise and counsel your patient on the seriousness of their condition and how to avoid infecting others. As one California court stated, "Such precautions are not taken to protect the health of the patient, whose well-being has already been compromised, such precautions are taken to safeguard the health of others."

At this point in the article, I should remind the readers that I am not an attorney and am not providing legal advice. The information is primarily based on my experiences within the realm of medical malpractice liability insurance.

That being said, there are some common-sense guidelines to help protect yourself from lawsuits of this nature:


  • Maintain, and periodically update, your practice's Policies & Procedures Manual, as well as your Employee Manual.

  • Maintain detailed records on all formal and informal education undertaken by members of your practice, group, clinic or hospital.

  • Maintain detailed employee records of all disciplinary warnings and resolutions.

  • Exercise due diligence in hiring employees and entering into real or ostensible partnerships. Think of yourself as an underwriter determining the level of risk.

  • Exercise similar due diligence in renting space to another provider within your facility.

  • Conduct regular, full-staff meetings to reinforce behavioral patterns and operational procedures within your organization.

  • Be wary of any informal or casual conversations about another physician's patient.

  • Document and keep a file on all such casual conversations in the same manner you would document a patient visit.

  • Issue specific guidelines related to the treatment of patients with dangerous communicable diseases, follow such guidelines to the letter, and document them in the patient file.

The threat and scope of potential litigation against doctors is growing. From the reality of today's economic turmoil to the loss of health insurance by hundreds of thousands of individuals and the growing utilization of non-physician professionals, lawyers are looking at the medical industry as fertile ground for lawsuits. Therefore it is critical that every organization audit and assess its operations from the viewpoint of the patients - both those you see and those you may not see.




J Michael Rosenthal, ARM - President and CEO, RGI Insurance Services

Mike Rosenthal is an Associate in Risk Management (ARM) and CEO of RGI Insurance Services. RGI Insurance Services provides all types of insurance for doctors and medical groups such as medical malpractice, workers compensation and group benefits as well as risk management services, human resource services and OSHA compliance services.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Secrets Lawyers Want to Keep From You When Committing Legal Malpractice

    Unfortunately a small percentage of any type of profession whether legal, medical or otherwise commit professional malpractice. So what secrets does your attorney want to conceal from you while committing professional negligence.

            Missing Deadlines - A negligent attorney will either not have a proper calendaring system or will procrastinate until the last minute and may frequently miss a statute of limitations or filing deadline. Calendaring errors are one of the leading causes of attorney malpractice claims. A negligent lawyer may try and keep this information from you or provide you with misinformation regarding these issues. It is important that when you interview a lawyer you get detailed information about how the attorney's office monitors all calendaring activities and whether or not they have had prior claims of attorney malpractice and the outcome of each case.

            Lack of Competence or Experience - An overly zealous attorney may agree to take a case where there is a potential of a large fee without possessing the necessary knowledge or experience. Make sure that before you hire an attorney that you conduct a thorough interview and determine how many cases like yours the attorney has handled and what type of a result the lawyer obtained in each case.

            Taking on Too Many Cases - An attorney who has a workload that they currently cannot manage is a recipe for a malpractice action. Does your attorney return your calls, are tasks done on a timely basis, is follow up done and reported to you, are you satisfied with the communications from your attorney. If you are constantly dissatisfied with the services your lawyer is providing to you it might be time to look for another lawyer. 

            If you feel your attorney has committed malpractice in the handling of your claim you need to speak with an experienced lawyer immediately.




Attorney Richard Hastings, for the past two and one half decades, has been helping injured clients and families collect millions of dollars in cases ranging from motor vehicle accidents to wrongful death, to medical malpractice. He is the founder of Selectcounsel, LLC, a free service that helps you find one of the best lawyers in your area and is the author of the books "How To Find A Great Lawyer" and "Understanding And Improving The Value Of Your Personal Injury Case."

Selectcounsel, LLC is a FREE national service that helps people with serious personal injury and medical malpractice cases find one of the best lawyers in their area to represent them. The lawyers we recommend are independently rated by attorneys and judges as being among the very best in their field of practice. Visit us at http://selectcounsel.com/ to see how we can help you find one of the best lawyers for your case.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

The Issues Involved With Making a Medical Malpractice Claim

The issues involved with making a medical malpractice claim.

It's a subject no one ever wants to consider when thinking about our healthcare. We put our lives and wellbeing in the hands of medical staff everyday and we rely on getting the very best treatment during illness or an emergency. Our trust is based on the lengthy education process that our doctors and nurses have to go through, and we're confident that staff are properly qualified and able before they ever start treating patients. But everybody is capable of making mistakes and there are a thousand reasons why something could go wrong with treatment or unexpected complications occur as a result of mistakes made by a medical team or institution; and just because some wrong was done to you unintentionally doesn't necessarily make the reality of the consequences any easier to deal with.

There has been a lot of coverage in the press recently about the state of Britain's NHS, particularly regarding the cleanliness and performance of hospitals. We're dealing with the, often overwhelming, problem of containing the MRSA virus, which spreads around hospitals due to poor hygiene practises and can vary in degrees of seriousness ranging from a mild illness to causing death in particularly vulnerable patients. And of course, our latest viral crisis is the swine flu has also been making the news in relation to poor service and cleanliness in our hospitals. The unfortunate truth is that many people claim that they or their loved ones were affected by diseases such as these as a direct result of negligence or incompetence on the part of hospitals or medical teams.

We all understand the pressure put on our NHS by outbreaks such as these but it isn't always an acceptable excuse for the poor standards some hospitals struggle to maintain.

So when does an issue go from being an individual or institution under strain, to being their direct responsibility?

The basic definition of medical malpractice is when a care provider fails to fulfil their duty to you as a patient resulting in injury or illness to you. Whenever this duty is breached it becomes a malpractice issue.

The situations and reasons for wanting to make a claim vary widely and unfortunately could be something serious and life changing. The negligence of another may have resulted in the death of a loved one, for example, or procedures used in the birth of a child may have resulted in serious birth defects. In either situation you might wish to make a claim not merely to fight for justice but for financial compensation. The extra care a child might need throughout their lives could be expensive, or the death of a spouse might leave you struggling financially as well as emotionally.

Whatever your reasons, pursuing your claim could mean a huge difference to your life and wellbeing. It might not be an easy fight; it could be very demanding and difficult for you emotionally and daunting facing a professional body to accuse them of negligence. You will need to prove that whoever was involved failed in their duty to you, that they were directly responsible for your situation. You may need to gather evidence and possibly witnesses to back up your accusation.

You shouldn't worry about the implications of your accusation. As long as you are genuine and are telling the truth as it happened then the responsibility lies with whoever you feel was negligent. Medical staff are required by law to hold up to date Professional Liability Insurance which will them cover their defence but, ultimately, if they were indeed at fault, then they must accept the consequences.

If you are serious about claiming you should speak to a professional like Accident Consult They will go through your case with you and review the details, then work with you to get you the very best results.




If you are serious about claiming you should speak to a professional like Accident Consult. They will go through your case with you and review the details, then work with you to get you the very best results.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Protecting Yourself From Legal Malpractice

If we have had the misfortune of meeting the wrong lawyer, most of do not attempt to take action against the lawyer because we feel that the lawyer is above the reach of law. However, that is a misconception. Lawyers can be held accountable for legal malpractices.

The United States and many countries across the globe have introduced laws that hold legal professionals accountable for their actions. This means that the lawyer has to behave in a professional, responsible and ethical manner. For some reason if you come to realize that the lawyer you hired is not trustworthy or ethical, you have every right to protect yourself from legal malpractice.

You can sue a lawyer for legal malpractice. Legal malpractice is when your lawyer misrepresents you, is negligent, overbills you for services rendered, and breaches his fiduciary duties or his agreement with you.

In order to sue a lawyer for legal malpractice, you would have to act very quickly. The best way to go about it is to approach the State Bar Association. The Bar will be able to give you an idea about the statute of limitation and will be able to refer a lawyer who can take up the legal malpractice case on your behalf.

Before you rush to sue your lawyer, do remember that suing him will be an extremely expensive affair. It would be in your best interests to resolve the dispute with the lawyer before the case reaches the court.

It is an unfortunate situation when one has to sue a lawyer for legal malpractice. Lawyers are meant to be guardians of law and are there to protect a common man's rights. However, there have been instances when lawyers have conveniently forgotten this and resorted to unethical ways and misrepresentation of their clients.




Check Out More Articles:

What Happens If I Don't Pay a Speeding Ticket?,

Fake doctor sick notes,

Free Criminal Background Check,