Types of Medical Malpractice Insurance

One of the first elements attorneys consider in a malpractice case is the type of insurance the accused medical professional has and the liability coverage limits of the specific policy. Different insurance types and liability limits warrant different case strategies.

If you are considering filing a medical malpractice claim, you may find it helpful to know more about malpractice insurance and how it may impact your case. There are two primary types of medical malpractice insurance coverage: claims-made and occurrence coverage.

Lawyer Malpractice

Claims-made medical malpractice coverage

Types of Medical Malpractice Insurance

Similar to home or auto insurance policies, claims-made insurance policies cover malpractice that takes place during the policy period. Unlike traditional home or auto insurance, however, for a claim to be covered, it must also be reported to the insurance company during the active policy period.

If a claims-made malpractice policy is switched to a new carrier or canceled for any reason without provisions to extend coverage beyond the coverage period, no benefits will be paid, even if the act of malpractice occurred while the policy was in force. Instead, a medical provider could be held personally liable for the costs associated with your claim, without a liability cap.

Your attorney knows to explore the insurance coverage of the accused medical provider in your claim to determine exactly how coverage-or lack of coverage-may impact your case.

Occurrence medical malpractice policies

An occurrence policy insures for any incident that occurs while the policy is in effect, regardless of when a claim is filed, even if the policy has been canceled since the act of malpractice occurred. Occurrence policies take into account current and future claims of malpractice, although the limits of liability are those in effect when the incident occurred.

Under an occurrence insurance policy, your medical malpractice lawyer knows going into the lawsuit what the liability limits will be in your case and plans the strategy of your case accordingly.

How does malpractice coverage work?

Imagine an incident of malpractice occurred on July 1, 2004. The treating physician became aware that there may be a possible claim on July 1, 2005 and notified the insurance carrier then. On July 1, 2006, a medical malpractice claim was filed.

• An occurrence policy in effect on July 1, 2004 would cover the claim, despite when the actual lawsuit was filed or notification made to the insurance company.
• A claims-made policy in effect on July 1, 2006 would cover the claim, as long as the retroactive date is no later than July 1, 2004.
• A claims-made policy in effect on July 1, 2004, but terminated as of July 1, 2005 would deny the claim because the active coverage period ended before the claim was reported to the insurance company. If the physician did not purchase "tail" coverage to extend the provisions of his malpractice insurance of 2004, the physician may become personally liable for the costs associated with this malpractice claim.

Types of Medical Malpractice InsuranceJ. Cole - Can't Get Enough (Clean Version) ft. Trey Songz Tube. Duration : 4.05 Mins.

Music video by J Cole featuring Trey Songz performing Can't Get Enough. (c) 2011 Roc Nation LLC

Tags: Cole, featuring, Trey, Songz, Can't, Get, Enough, Roc, Nation/Columbia, Rap

The intricacies of medical malpractice insurance can be complex. Experienced Chicago medical malpractice lawyers are your best resource to assess the merits of your medical malpractice claim.

Visit : portable generator review surge protector for whole house apple ipod nano Humminbird Gps Fishfinder Combo

What to Do When You Become a Victim of Medical Malpractice?

Medical malpractice and health care reforms have become major issues, especially in the current volatile political climate of the Obama administration. Add to it the rising costs of healthcare and diminishing coverage for most individuals. In such demanding situations, if you become a victim of medical malpractice, it is time you stand up, be counted and know your rights. Since every state has its own interpretation of consumer medical malpractice rights, it is recommended you consult an attorney or lawyer well versed in this field.

Firstly, before you meet your attorney, compile all the facts, records and evidence. Also discuss your case with a medical professional and obtain a sworn affidavit from him/her justifying your case. Courts require this affidavit to evaluate your damages and the monetary benefits you are eligible for. However, time is of major essence here. Many civil and state courts require you to file your claim within a specified amount of time. You typically have 24 to 30 months within which you can file your malpractice claim. A lawyer with medical background is of paramount importance in such a situation.

Lawyer Malpractice

Secondly, get a fair idea of the costs and overheads you are likely to encounter while filing your case. Make sure both your attorney and you have the right resources to cover every facet of the case. This includes physicians' opinions and testimonies, exhibits, medical records and transcripts, illustrations, models and diagrams.

What to Do When You Become a Victim of Medical Malpractice?

Finally, you must successfully prove the following:

1. Your health care provider/physician owed its/him/her duty to you
2. Your health care provider/physician breached its/him/her duties
3. You have been rendered an injury due to negligence or breach of duty

In many cases, attorneys turn down requests to file for malpractice cases. Your attorney will do so if:

1. You are unable to find any expert to testify in your favor
2. The cost of pursuing a claim exceeds the expected returns from the verdict

Steps Taken by a Medical Malpractice Lawyer

An experienced lawyer would normally follow these steps:

1. He/she would interview the patient or the family members of the deceased and gather all data that would help confirm his/her suspicions. He/she would evaluate the nature and potential amount of losses incurred from the case. He/she would also review the medical history of the survivor or the deceased.

2. Obtain relevant medical records and evaluate them vis--vis the period of malpractice.

3. Select a medical advisory panel that would review the records and make necessary observation and recommendations. This step is mandated by the law.

4. Evaluate the recommendations and determines whether the case qualifies as a successful malpractice claim.

Based on these, the client will be advised on whether to proceed with filing a lawsuit or refrain from it.

What to Do When You Become a Victim of Medical Malpractice?AA-12 Fully Automatic Shotgun!!! Video Clips. Duration : 5.95 Mins.

www.facebook.com Follow me: twitter.com www.facebook.com FOR OVERSEAS-MILITARY-AND POLICE INQUIRIES ONLY AA12SLEDGEHAMMER@GMAIL.COM

Tags: AA12, AA-12, AA12 SHOTGUN, AA-12 SHOTGUN, AA-12 FULLY AUTOMATIC SHOTGUN, FPSRUSSIA AA12, FPS RUSSIA AA12, AA12 SLEDGEHAMMER, AA-12 SLEDGEHAMMER, FPSRUSSIA GUNS, FPS RUSSIA SLEDGEHAMMER

Russ Babka, a medical malpractice lawyer can help you with a lawsuit.

Recommend : portable generator review hdtv 1080p High Speed Scanner mesothelioma treatment options

Motorcycle Accident Attorney Dallas W. Hartman - What you apperceive unduly motorcycle insurance

Dallas W. Hartman



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0gMPsMnK-Q&hl=en

My Father Was a Medical Malpractice Victim - A True Story

I was 14 years old when my mother came home from the hospital and told me my father had died. "How did it happen?" I asked. "Why did it happen," my brother questioned. "What happened?" asked our dazed and confused family.

From that day forward, I began to learn what a malpractice lawyer does. I learned that we had more questions than answers. My dad was young, only 46 years old. He wasn't supposed to die. He had a family with three young children. He was gainfully employed and worked hard to provide for our family.

Our lawyer got the hospital records, and he had a medical expert review the records. The more our lawyer probed, the more questions we raised. "Why was he given that medication?" "When did the nurse arrive?" "Why wasn't a blood test ordered?" "What happened when..."

Years later, while I was in college, our case came up for trial. I joined my mom for part of the trial, since it was during final exams. Being in Court was unfamiliar territory. Everything was formal. The procedures, the words, the questions-all need explaining. Our lawyer was a big-time lawyer whose hair was gray and was respected by numerous lawyers who passed him in the hallways in the courthouse. Their nods and greetings were deferential- with respect for his accomplishments and greatness.

I watched with fascination the rapt attention everyone had during cross-examination of the primary target in the case- a young doctor in training who committed the gravest of medical sins. Our lawyer was intense. The barrage of questions put to the young unapologetic doctor were non-stop. The answers were not satisfactory to our lawyer, or to the jury, or so it seemed to me.

The tension in the Court room was palpable and created knots in my stomach. The defense attorney was gentlemanly and put on airs. In my book he was a phony and I was hoping the jury would see through it.

Closing arguments came after three weeks of trial. I managed to arrive just as the trial resumed that day. I rushed from school to be in Court with my mom. What I witnessed that day caused me to apply to law school. Before that day, I was a biology major and was intent upon applying to medical school. You see, my father was a doctor and most of my family are doctors. I thought that was the path I'd naturally take. Not after witnessing closing remarks.

It is now twenty three years later and I vividly remember the day our famous lawyer made his closing remarks to the jury hearing our malpractice case. Neither the lawyer or my mother are alive today, but my memory of that trial lives on till today.

I remember most clearly the accusations directed at the young inexperienced doctor. I saw his red face and neck. I wanted to reach across the aisle of the courtroom and pummel him with my fists. That would be true justice! That would satisfy my anger that had built up for years waiting for this disputed case to come up for trial. Fortunately for the doctor, my senses overcame my desires to quash this little bug. He never knew what I wanted to do to him that day.

On that day, I realized that this lawyer- this ordinary looking, gray-haired man, who had accomplished great things legal- was telling a story so simple and clear that I realized anyone could do this. That day, I decided to become a lawyer.

One would think that with such a great lawyer anything would be possible. Unfortunately for my family, the results were not what we would have hoped. Despite this second loss, the first being losing my dad, I picked myself off and sent out those law school applications. I had one thing on my mind...to become a trial lawyer.

I've been a medical malpractice trial lawyer for the past 17 years now. The first 4 years as a defense lawyer representing doctors, hospitals and folks sued in accident cases. The next 13 years I spent representing injured victims in their quest for justice. When asked by a colleague which I prefer, representing injured victims or the wrongdoing doctor, my answer has always been clear...the injured victim.

My experience helped me understand what injured people have endured. It has allowed me to be more compassionate about the people I have the privilege of representing. This is my calling.

This is a true story.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

San Francisco Birth Injury Lawyer Infant Death Attorney CA

www.thebirthinjurylawfirm.com 888.732.8897 When you contact a potential birth injury, contact a lawyer Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger in San Francisco, California. Call the company.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGP2FP30mL8&hl=en

Medical Malpractice - Failure To Diagnose A Heart Attack

How does a doctor "fail to diagnose a heart attack?"

In one of two ways:

1. He fails to recognize the signs and symptoms of an impending heart attack, or an ongoing heart attack, or

2. He fails to properly interpret the tests that were taken.

Let's talk about #1 above. Typically, a patient will go to a hospital emergency room with complaints of belly or chest pain. The pain could be radiating from the chest to the shoulder or arm. The patient might be sweaty and clammy. They could be experiencing crushing chest pain. The problem arises when the patient's complaints are not typical for what is commonly seen in a heart attack victim.

The words "heart attack" are a misnomer. What do I mean? The doctors refer to a heart attack as a "myocardial infarction." It basically means one of two things: (1) That part of your heart muscle has died, or (2) The blood vessel(s) that supply the heart with blood and oxygen has been cut off, causing part of your heart to starve and possibly die.

When we hear that someone has had heart bypass surgery, it usually means that one or more of the blood vessels that supply the heart with blood and oxygen has been restricted or obstructed, and surgery was done to allow blood to 'bypass' or go around the obstruction.

Sometimes when a patient presents to a doctor or an emergency room with an upset stomach or back pain, the doctor may not correctly interpret the symptoms, and may incorrectly diagnose the patient as having a gastric problem (a problem with their digestive system) and not a cardiac problem. The problem arises when the patient returns home and hours or days later, they die as a result of a 'heart attack'.

Let's discuss #2 above, where the doctor incorrectly interprets the EKG or a stress test, and thinks it's normal, when in reality it is not. Again, the patient is discharged home with instructions on diet and exercise and to follow up with their doctor or cardiologist in a few weeks. Needless to say, the patient returns home and days, weeks, or even months later, the patient dies of a heart attack.

What does a New York medical malpractice attorney look for when evaluating a claim of "failure to diagnose a heart attack?" Your attorney needs to know the following:

1. If you had been correctly diagnosed at the time you had symptoms, what treatment would you have had? Would you have had a stent put in your cardiac artery or vein (a stent is a device designed to open up a clogged artery or vein, and is put in using a catheter, instead of having major open-heart surgery)? Would you have received nitroglycerin to help ease the flow of blood and reduce your pain?

2. Would you have had elective open-heart bypass surgery? By elective, I mean that you have had time to discuss the surgery with your doctor and learn about the risks, benefits and alternatives to the surgery. Sometimes when a patient has had a heart attack, tests might reveal that many of the blood vessels supplying the heart are severely clogged. The patient may then need emergency bypass surgery, and you may not have a chance to discuss any alternatives, as there may not be any at that point.

3. If elective bypass surgery were done, and there was no blood vessel that remained clogged, would you have suffered the heart attack that you ultimately did? If the answer is no, then your potential malpractice case just got stronger. In other words, if your injuries were preventable if you had been timely diagnosed, you would not be in the condition you're in now. That's very significant and important.

Recently, I had the privilege of representing a young man whose cardiac condition was misdiagnosed. He had gone to a hospital with complaints of chest pain that was incorrectly diagnosed. He was told to follow-up with his cardiologist to address his ongoing complaints of chest pain. Three months later, this young man suffered a devastating heart attack, killing off a large part of his heart muscle. When the records were reviewed by cardiologists (heart doctors) we learned that the doctors initially misread the diagnostic tests that were performed, and missed the key opportunity to perform elective heart bypass surgery. As a result of that failure, months went by where the young man continued to complain of chest pain. The heart attack has destroyed this man's life. Unfortunately for him, his heart attack was totally preventable.

A heart attack may be preventable. Let your lawyer know what symptoms, if any, you had when you saw your doctor and what was done for you. Tell your attorney the details of what went on in the emergency room and what tests they performed to find out if you had or were having a heart attack. Prevention is always best. Knowing that a heart attack could have been prevented is second best.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

Are You A Victim of Medical Malpractice-Informed Consent

You should know what is "informed consent". Informed consent is to be obtained from well informed patients about their own health care in making decisions on their own free will before the patient is subjected to serious treatment or operation. This is a legal obligation and it is the ethical right of the patient.

The patient should be aware of his rights and participate in the discussions and decisions. And he should be given the freedom to decide on:

1. the alternatives to the proposed operation or treatment.

2. the process and its nature

3. the risks involved

4. the extend of the uncertainties involved

And if needed repeat the explaining part in a simple layman's language and make sure he understood and accepted the proposed course of treatment/operation.

The informed consent should be legally valid and the patient should be in a competent state of mind and his consent must be voluntary. In certain cases the patients feel helpless and vulnerable to any coercive tactics. And he or she should be made comfortable and relaxed before the consent form is signed.

The informed consent process should be a clear acceptance of the proposed treatment or surgery and on his/her own free will. To improve the confidence of the patient, he should be allowed to seek a second opinion. This action will make sure the informed consent is a very well informed comprehensive consent.

In some delicate cases, the Doctor may be constrained to withhold certain portion of the information. This is physician's discretion in the best interest of the patient. This is also tailored information supplied to obtain the patient's informed consent.

Let, Us, Help,Lawyer, Advice - "Medical Malpractice Lawsuits".

A Look at MICRA and Medical Malpractice in California

It is not the intent of this article to give an exhaustive treatise on MICRA, but rather to familiarize the reader with some of the highlights of the legislation that govern the prosecution of medical negligence cases from my perspective.

Although not strictly a personal injury case, most California personal injury attorneys consider medical malpractice to fall under the general banner of personal injury law. Many personal injury lawyers also practice medical malpractice law.

Specifically, medical malpractice is a case against a health care provider for substandard treatment of care recognized for medical practitioners in their community and causes further injury or death to a patient. The practice of medical malpractice law in California is governed by the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, or "MICRA" as it is commonly called. This Act, passed in 1975, regulates medical malpractice cases. The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act is also in effect in a number of states around the country.

As the victim of a medical malpractice claim, one is able to collect, compensatory damages that may include the costs incurred around medical expenses, lost wages. A victim of medical malpractice may also be entitled to collect other special damages. Under the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act restricts "general damages" or pain and suffering and emotional distress awards to a maximum of $250,000. The limit on the award for general damages holds true no matter how serious the injury caused to the victim.

The Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act also regulates attorney fees on a sliding scale that diminishes the amount paid to the attorney of the recovery. It must also be kept in mind that the costs of prosecution including costs of retention of expert witness and depositions are deducted from the settlement or court award prior to the calculation of attorney fees. In the typical personal injury case the usual custom and practice in the legal community is for attorney fees to be calculated as a percentage of the gross recovery.

The average person may think that regulating attorney fees and costs is advantageous to the consumer. This notion, in fact, is untrue; these types of regulations actually work against the consumer. Restricting the amount of fees an attorney can charge, changing the manner in which fees are calculated, and, most importantly, limiting the amount of general damages, makes it far more difficult for the victim of medical malpractice to find an attorney willing to represent their case. When injured victims cannot find counsel, the final result is often medical malpractice cases cannot be prosecuted in a cost effective and profitable manner. It is not uncommon for medical malpractice lawyers to speak to a prospective client who has already spoken to numerous attorneys trying to find representation, many times with no luck at all. Of course, discouraging medical malpractice cases was one of the primary objectives of MICRA as well as limiting just and deserved compensation to injured victims. It is also worth noting that the primary provision, including the limit on damages, has not changed since MICRA was enacted more than 30 years ago!

Most personal injury attorneys can answer your specific questions as to how MICRA would apply in the individual case. If you have a question about MICRA, or personal injury law in general please consult your local personal injury lawyer who can give you the specifics as to how your situation is impacted by the law.

Since 1985 San Diego personal injury attorney Jeffrey Frank has been representing medical malpractice claims. As a medical malpractice lawyer in San Diego, California, Jeffrey Frank offers comprehensive legal services for victims of substandard medical treatment.

Best Los Angeles Attorneys

Given the healthy business profile in Los Angeles, it can be expected that there would be times when businesses would be involved in various legal matters, which include negotiating a merger or law suits. However, given that in these instances, businesses need to have people who would aggressively represent their interests, it is very important that businesses get the best lawyers possible. Unfortunately, there are some businesses, especially those that have just started their operations that are not aware of the sources from which they can get very good lawyers. The good news is that there are some steps that these businesses can take to help them get the best lawyer that would aggressively represent their interests in a number of situations.

Some helpful steps

One of the best ways for businesses to have access to very good lawyers is to ask for referrals from their colleagues in the industry. This is because given the legal matters that are involved in running a business; these businesses can refer some of the better lawyers that they have worked with in the past. In addition to this, businesses can also gain access to first hand information on lawyers from their colleagues. In the process of shopping for a lawyer, it would also be helpful for businesses if they asked for references from the lawyers they are considering. This can be very helpful because by interviewing not only the lawyer but also the references the lawyer would give, business owners can gauge the skill level of the lawyer based on how he handled the cases of his other clients. Another good way by which businesses can gain access to good lawyers is to ask other lawyers, which include their tax lawyers. This is because lawyers who have a good reputation among their colleagues can be considered some of the best lawyers given the respect that other lawyers have for them.

In a city like Los Angeles, getting a good lawyer is not a luxury but a necessity for businesses given the legal aspects that are involved in running and maintaining a business. The good news is that businesses can gain access to some of the best lawyers by employing simply knowing where to look and who to ask because knowledge on these can give businesses access to lawyers who would aggressively represent their interests in the legal arena.

Los Angeles Attorneys provides detailed information on Los Angeles Attorneys, Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorneys, Los Angeles Business Attorneys, Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorneys and more. Los Angeles Attorneys is affiliated with Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyers [http://www.e-LosAngelesLawyers.com].

Car Wreck Lawyer Chicago Illinois Truck Accident Lawyer

www.prescription-malpractice.com If You've Been in a car, truck or motorcycle accident, contact one of our attorneys in the Scanlan Law Group Chicago, Illinois at 877-494-1309. Our lawyers can help with your motor vehicle case now.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pxkTlg092I&hl=en

Filing Medical Malpractice Claims

Filing a medical malpractice case is not a task done easily. Reputation of doctors needs to be kept in mind while going up against them. Truth will not be just enough if a case needs to be taken upon hospitals, insurance companies and doctors for their alleged malpractice. Medical malpractice as such may include any one of the following, surgical errors, hospital negligence, pharmacy errors, failure to diagnose, birth injuries, medication errors, cerebral palsy etc. Statistics have shown the rise in the number of medical errors. It is unfortunate that about quarter of a million deaths have occurred due to preventable medical errors.

We all know and must agree that medical profession is a very much essential service. To prove a case of medical malpractice one must try to hire highly educated and reputed lawyers who specialize on those issues. Florida medical malpractice lawyers are working in teams who specialize in medical negligence issues and supported by researchers and investigators. Physicians employed by the federal government can be brought to justice under the Federal Torts Claim Act. One must always bear in mind that doctors will go to any extent in order to save their reputation. So care must be taken while choosing lawyers who can do justice to a case.

Several points need to be taken note of when a client files a malpractice suit against a medical practitioner. Florida malpractice lawyers collect in-depth information about the laws governing medical malpractice. He then interviews the client to ask several questions to find out if the case is valid and the client is trustworthy person or not. As it is a serious case, the lawyer has to be careful in dealing with fraudulent clients. Unless there is any visible injury, court will not give any money. If a lawyer is shocked by hearing the case history, he can go ahead otherwise there is absolutely no use in taking the proceedings any further.

Another serious issue that Florida malpractice lawyers come over is that of hospital infections. Investigations by the Centers for disease Control has revealed that an estimate of 103,000 deaths was linked to such infections in the year 2000. It comes as a surprise that infections from hospitals form the fourth leading cause for death. Such infections may have come in the form of germ-laden instruments, unclean procedures, and not washing hands between patients by some doctors and nurses. If a client is affected by such procedures he can approach a lawyer to file a suit against the concerned doctors and hospitals.

For more information about Florida Malpractice Lawyer.

Seattle Car Accident Attorney - Allstate Insurance

Davis Law Group, PS - Seattle Personal Injury Lawyers help the victims of wrongful death, car accidents, medical malpractice, and more ... The Seattle personal injury attorneys at the Davis Law Group, PS are dedicated to the protection of your interests and handling your own case ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuUHBrnSr6Q&hl=en

Hoffspiegel & Associates

Lloyd Hoffspiegel - Attorney at Law ... Lloyd Hoffspiegel "lawyer attorney Atlanta, Georgia," Personal Injury "Medical Malpractice" wrongful death "car accident" Workers Compensation "Sexual Abuse Litigation"



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hbz6SUTrS4&hl=en

California Medical Malpractice Lawyer Cheerleader Injury

California Medical Malpractice Lawyer Bruce Fagel is a student who is in a cheer leading routine in the school, which violated the brain damage. The Law Office of Bruce Fagel and Associates handles all medical malpractice cases including birth injuries, brain damage, cerebral palsy, wrongful death, Kaiser malpractice, cancer misdiagnosis, Brachial Plexis injuries, nursing home negligence, doctor or hospital malpractice and more. They serve Los Angeles, Orange County and all ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U48QOd_yWUU&hl=en

NY Medical Malpractice - Improperly Placed Suture Causes Permanent Nerve Damage

Here's an interesting case I handled recently: It involved a young man who put his arm through a window. He was taken to the emergency room where he was bleeding profusely from cutting an artery. He had a "pumper," with blood spurting and pulsating out like a garden hose. While in the emergency room a doctor tried to stop the bleeding by applying pressure to the wound. This worked, but the young man needed a blood transfusion since he lost a lot of blood during the five minutes from accident site to the hospital.

After the bleeding was initially controlled, another doctor came to stitch the wound. The doctor, while throwing stitches, never realized that he put a stitch around the ulnar nerve! This is a big "no-no." Stitches are meant to tie off bleeding vessels like veins and arteries. They are not meant to tie off good, healthy nerves.

Importantly, while the patient was being stitched up, he yelled out that his arm felt as if it had been 'zapped', similar to hitting your funny bone. The doctor simply said "Don't worry about it, you'll be fine." Well, a day or two later, the young man, thinking that it's ok to have unusual sensations in his had following this accident did not think much of the ongoing discomfort he was having in his hand. By day three, he started to think something was really wrong. His fourth and fifth finger were getting numb and were also painful.

The patient returned to the hospital, where it took some coercion to get the clinic residents to evaluate his hand. Despite the patient's complaints, he was sent home, and told it it normal to have this pain following such an accident. Two days later, the numbness and inability to move the fourth and fifth fingers brought the patient back to the hospital clinic. Again, nobody recognized that the young man's ulnar nerve was dying off before their eyes.

This young man made a wise decision to get an opinion from an experienced hand surgeon in New York City. Immediately upon being examined, the hand surgeon advised the patient that he had significant damage to his ulnar nerve; precisely the nerve that controls the fourth and fifth fingers. Exploratory surgery revealed the patient's worst fears:

"A suture used to tie off bleeding vessels had somehow been used instead to tie off your ulnar nerve," was what the hand surgeon advised him. "As a result, your ulnar nerve was deprived of oxygen and blood flow, causing the nerve to die." This young man was told that he'd need another surgery to try and transplant another nerve from a different part of his body into his arm to see if that would help. He was told that nerves can regenerate, if lucky, at a rate of one inch per month. In other words, a very slow process.

The second surgery went well, and he did not need a nerve transplant. Instead, the existing nerve was cleaned up, and stretched as gingerly as possible to get close enough to attempt to reattach the two damaged ends of the nerve. Eighteen months later, this patient still had loss of sensation and decrease in function in his hand.

The moral of this tragic story is that this injury was totally preventable. Had the emergency room doctor been careful in placing those stitches, and had the clinic residents recognized the signs of nerve damage two days after the accident, this event leading to permanent nerve damage never would have happened.

End Result:

Through extensive investigation and many depositions, I was able to finally learn that one or more doctors had sutured the wound closed. What made this case so fascinating is that the doctor or doctors who stitched this patient up, never wrote a note in the hospital chart- It's almost as if they knew what they did was inappropriate and did not want to acknowledge it.

The case settled favorably during jury selection.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice, wrongful death and injury cases since 1988. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. For more information, call him personally at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry's free instructional videos on New York Medical Malpractice & accident law.

The Unstable Medical Malpractice Insurance Rates

One would be hard pressed to impart actual figures relating to the medical malpractice insurance rates since there is a host of variables which apparently influence the cost of such insurance. It is adequate to say that the outlay has exceeded any expectations from the medical profession. Unfortunately, there appears to be no leveling out of these rates at this time.

The common medical practitioner who is initially purchasing their malpractice insurance is questionably shocked to discover their premiums recurrently rising. This increase in rates is not restricted to any one medical discipline but rather it is a reflection upon the medical industry as a whole. Between the bizarre jury monetary awards and the intensified legal defense costs the medical malpractice insurance market has been forced to repeatedly adjust the medical rates accordingly.

It has been many years now since the physicians have experienced a stable rate in their malpractice insurance and it is likely that they will not see this desperately needed leveling within the near future. Concern has been naturally expressed regarding the incorrigible adverse patient outcomes which symbolize the underlying factor for determining the physicians expected rates. The likelihood is eminent that such adverse reactions to these medical outcomes will ultimately result in legal actions is the major cause of these increased rates.

When a claim is initially submitted there are numerous cost influences which have a propensity to shape the final outcome. These factors stretch from the nature of the grievance, the complete extent from which the provided caretaker is able to be legally defended as well as the compliance of the doctor himself to participate in his own defense. In our society today the irregularity of jury awarded claims has driven settlement costs sky-high and the attitude towards the doctor's proficiency fosters a legal environment where the liability insurance companies and the policyholder's would prefer to merely settle the cases out of court. 

Additional factors which contribute to these unrealistic rates can embrace the amount of insurance coverage held, the exact number of physicians concerned in the claim and the individual hospitals limits of required coverage. 

These combinations of factors have contributed to an 88 percent increase in rates between 1994 and the year 2000. The medical defense costs persist in reaching higher amounts as the attorney fees escalate, expert witness fees become elevated and the general cost of court reports, travel expenses and other related costs rise. Once again a rise is continuously shown from 1994 to 2000 by as much as 39 percent for defense of a claim. 

In conclusion, it comes as no surprise that the increase in malpractice insurance rates is a direct result of the escalating costs necessary to resolve and defend against excessive claim amounts. You can readily see that given the particular insurance industry facts it is virtually impossible to predict any sort of future malpractice insurance rate variance. If our current medical jury awards continue as they have been shown we can expect drastic increases in the future as well. 

To learn much more about malpractice insurance, visit malpractice-history.com where you'll find this and much more, including malpractice statistics and advice.

Discover How Medical Malpractice Law Protects You

Health care providers of all sorts are supposed to do whatever they can to protect their patients during treatment and all aspects of health care. They have the responsibility to treat their patients with the best care they can and are licensed to give. Should a doctor not do what is expected of them and not give proper medical care, they can be held liable for any medical malpractice they may have caused.

It is the job of the government to help protect everyone from becoming involved in situations that present further harm. In just about every state in the US, there are major medical malpractice suits that are increasing every day. It is the job of the government to prove that all conditions have been and were met before any malpractice claim with the court.

There are many different ways that one can approach filing a medical malpractice suit. They are based in the issue at hand and filed with the most emergency situations first. In many states you have to simply have an understanding of the enacted laws, but there are states that just require a person to have a knowledge of the law regarding medical malpractice laws in order to be able to file a claim. There are some states that have a special panel that looks over the cases that are filed. They are going to be limiting the amount of damages that a person filing a claim can receive.

Medical malpractice claims can be filed in the event of a incorrect diagnoses, failing to provide the correct treatment for a disease or for not treating a condition in a timely manner where that failure results in the patient becoming sicker or even death. There are more things that one can file a medical malpractice claim on, just make sure that you know all the rules and stipulations that need to be followed. You are going to have to be able to prove that they health care provider or the physician failed to provide the correct treatment and care, that resulted in some kind of injury. You are also going to have to present actual proof if to prove the damages were either physical or emotional.
The courts do not view frivolous suits favorably. If the hospital charged you $75 for a Band-Aid during your stay, while that is ridiculous, it is not medical malpractice. Billing errors are also not considered malpractice.

Hiring an attorney to help you with filing your claim is the best way to go. They are going to be able to tell you if you have a case that will hold up in court or not. They are going to be using the help of an expert witness to prove your case. Expert witnesses are going to have to be reliable and prove your case. They must have a certain amount of experience and knowledge in order to be able to prove your case. But an experienced malpractice lawyer knows where to get these kinds of resources quickly if they need to.

Every state has their own set of limits when it comes to medical malpractice. It is of extreme importance that you become familiar with all the laws and procedures that are required in order to file a medical malpractice claim. It may be in your best interests that you check on every physician and their background before allowing them to give you any kind of treatment. Medical malpractice claims are something that have to limited and monitored for the costs of health care to be able to be affordable. With the help of an attorney, you should be able to get the justice that you and your family rightfully deserves.

Have you or a loved one been a victim of medical malpractice? For more insights and additional information on your rights if you are a victim of Medical Malpractice as well as finding a wealth of resources to help you with a possible lawsuit, please visit our web site at http://www.malpracticeinfonow.com