Showing posts with label Doctor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Doctor. Show all posts

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Sue a Doctor For Medical Negligence - 5 Steps to Follow to Win the Case

'Medical Negligence' refers to a mistake committed by a doctor while treating a patient. Each year, several such cases are brought to the court of law. If you too are a victim of medical malpractice, you have the absolute right to consider a malpractice claim against the health professional in question. However, to win such a case, it is essential to provide suitable evidence to prove that he/she was negligent during the treatment and that his/her action or complete lack of action caused further damage to your physical condition.

As such claims are expensive and very difficult to prove, it is advisable to prepare yourself well and analyze all the pros and cons before taking any decision. Here are 5 steps to follow before proceeding to the court to sue your doctor for medical negligence:

Lawyer Malpractice

1) Get in touch with a reputed attorney who has sufficient experience in dealing with medical malpractice cases. Hiring a lawyer might cost you a bit, but it is essential as he/she can help you file a lawsuit against the doctor in question.

Sue a Doctor For Medical Negligence - 5 Steps to Follow to Win the Case

2) A medical negligence claim is not very easy to prove. Therefore, before you proceed to the court, make sure you have enough evidence to establish that deviation from the normal standard of care harmed you and that other doctors of the same skill and experience level would not have acted in this manner.

3) Besides, to establish your claim, you would need to provide witnesses. An expert testimony can make the scale tilt in your favor. Therefore, locate as many expert witnesses as you can.

4) Next, collect suitable documents that can prove that the injury that you suffered was caused due to your doctor's negligence. Bear in mind, that you cannot sue a doctor for an injury that was caused before you consulted him/her.

5) During the trial, make sure you bring at least two copies of all your medical records to the court. You have the absolute right to demand a copy of your records from the doctor's office. Also, file medical records from the office of the doctor who treated the injury caused due to the negligence of the accused practitioner.

To put it in simple words, if you do proper research, follow the above guideline, and collect enough evidence to prove your claim, you are sure to win the case against the negligent doctor.

Sue a Doctor For Medical Negligence - 5 Steps to Follow to Win the CaseKaty Perry - The One That Got Away Tube. Duration : 4.85 Mins.


Sometimes you promise someone forever but it doesn't work out that way. Watch Katy Perry and Diego Luna star in the sixth chapter of the "Teenage Dream" story. Do you have "The One That Got Away"? Download "The One That Got Away", the sixth single off Katy's album 'Teenage Dream' here: goo.gl Music video by Katy Perry performing The One That Got Away. Directed by: Floria Sigismondi / Produced by: Jannie McInnes & Danny Lockwood (P) (C) 2011 Capitol Records, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is a violation of applicable laws. Manufactured by Capitol Records, LLC, 1750 North Vine Street, Hollywood, CA 90028.

Tags: Katy, Perry, The, One, That, Got, Away, Official, Music, Video, HD, Diego, Luna, Floria, Sigismondi, Teenage, Dream, TOTGA, Capitol, Records, Old, Elderly, VEVO

Get Expert Help to Sue your doctor and file a medical malpractice claim.

Also, read Affordable Ways to Sue to know how to proceed to the court even if you cannot afford a lawyer.

Friends Link : portable generator review gold watch Lowrance Gps Fishfinders gpsfish finder

Friday, April 22, 2011

Medical Malpractice - Why Is Your New York Doctor Afraid To Treat You?

I was in the emergency room with my son one evening, and the emergency room attending physician stayed 5 feet away from my son until he heard why we were there. There was an unspoken feeling that this doctor was afraid to touch my son and was hesitant to come near him until he absolutely had to. I should mention that my son did not have any communicable disease and had no festering sores or boils. He fell at camp and we felt he might have broken a bone. That's it.

I definitely got the sense that this doctor wasn't the only one who acted this way toward patients in the emergency room of a large university-based hospital, here in a suburb of New York.

Lawyer Malpractice

Once the doctor realized we weren't aliens from another planet, and that we weren't going to sue him for examining my son, his tone and body mannerisms softened slightly, and he returned to 'business-as-usual' in the emergency room.

Medical Malpractice - Why Is Your New York Doctor Afraid To Treat You?

Recently, whenever you walked into a doctor's office in New York you'd find articles (I call them propaganda) discussing the high costs of medical malpractice insurance and how it was the terrible trial lawyers who were making their lives miserable. I was fascinated by the material. It didn't bother me that the doctor was openly trying to get their patients to side with them in their fight against malpractice suits, but I was troubled by what was missing from these articles.

There was no attack upon the doctors' insurance companies. Nobody came forward to say they were being gouged unfairly for these ridiculous insurance costs. It was as if the doctors were turning a blind eye to the very people and companies who insured them in the event they were sued by a patient. It made no sense.

Whenever I brought this topic up to my doctor or a doctor I knew, I'd get a pause before any explanation. Most of the doctors I spoke to never thought about attacking their own insurance company. Rather, they were quite happy to see an organized effort to focus the blame on trial lawyers for their exceptionally high premiums. There is no question that doctors on Long Island pay some of the highest malpractice premiums in the country. The question of why this is so will best be addressed by politicians and people who have studied the exact reasons for this problem. I will however point out that many credible studies have consistently shown that the insurance companies are to blame for their own cries of "We need more money." Repeatedly, insurance companies have made poor investment choices and when they're in a downturn cycle, tend to get their advertising guns out and point the finger at everyone but themselves.

So why are doctors afraid to treat you? They're afraid of being sued. That's it. Some doctors practice without caring if someone sues them. They know they're providing the best medical care they can give. Other doctors look at patients as adversaries, never knowing when that lawsuit is going to hit.

Medical Malpractice - Why Is Your New York Doctor Afraid To Treat You?Halo: Reach - Achievement HORSE #13 (RADICAL Jack vs. GNARLY Geoff) Video Clips. Duration : 8.75 Mins.


Jack and Geoff square off in this battle to see who will re-take the lead in overall HORSE score. Who will win? Find out now! All maps are available at tinyurl.com

Keywords: Achievement, Hunter, HORSE, Halo, Reach, Bungie, Microsoft, Xbox, Jack, vs, Geoff, Smells, Really, awesome, fails, of, the, weak

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. See Gerry's website at http://www.oginski-law.com Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry's free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

See Also : portable generator review Canon Digital Camera plasma tv

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Medical Malpractice - Your Case Is On The Trial Calendar - Can Defense Lawyers Talk to Your Doctor?

Your New York attorney has notified the Court that your case is ready for trial.

It's been two years since you started your medical malpractice lawsuit in New York. You must now wait months before being notified by the Court that jury selection is to start on a specific date. In the interim, your lawyer tells you that the defense lawyers want to talk to your treating doctor. The purpose? To get dirt on you and try and minimize your injuries and permanent damages. "Can they do this?" you ask.

Lawyer Malpractice

The answer is yes.

Medical Malpractice - Your Case Is On The Trial Calendar - Can Defense Lawyers Talk to Your Doctor?

Here's what happens when a lawyer notifies the Court in New York State that a case is ready for trial:

1. The lawyer must file a document with the Court called a "Note of Issue" that must be sent to all the lawyers in the case. That document tells everyone that the discovery phase of the lawsuit is over. Discovery is the opportunity for all sides to obtain records, documents and pre-trial testimony relating to the case. Once the "Note of Issue" is filed, that closes the door to any party getting additional discovery.

2. In New York, if a defense lawyer wants to talk to your treating doctor, they must get a permission slip from you to talk to them. Otherwise, the doctor, by law, cannot speak to anyone about your care and treatment. "But it's not fair," you say. "Why should they use my own treating doctor to say bad things about me, or to ruin my case with his statements?" you ask frantically.

Here's the rationale: When you bring a lawsuit for medical malpractice or personal injury, you put your medical condition in issue. You claim that as a result of a doctors' wrongdoing, you suffered permanent injury. The defense is entitled to learn about the extent of your injuries by getting your medical records, and if necessary to speak to your treating doctors.

3. Recent case law in New York has held that if a defense attorney wants to question your doctor after the case has been put on the trial calendar, they can, with some restrictions.

4. The defense lawyer must first tell your lawyer he wants to question your doctor. Your lawyer is then obligated to provide a permission slip, that you have signed, giving the doctor permission to speak to the defense lawyer. Importantly, that permission slip should say that the doctor is not obligated to speak to the defense lawyer, but can do so if he chooses. That authorization should also say that the purpose of the defense lawyer speaking to the doctor is not at the request of the patient, but solely to help the defense lawyer in defending a doctor or hospital in this case.

5. If your doctor voluntarily chooses to speak to the defense lawyer, that attorney is obligated to notify your lawyer of the date of any meeting or telephone conference with your doctor. The defense lawyer is also obligated to provide your lawyer with any written notes of the meeting or phone conference with the treating doctor. This is supposed to provide both sides with similar information about what was discussed.

The rationale is that the patient's attorney can speak to her treating doctor at any time, whereas the defense attorney cannot. That's why NY Courts have allowed this procedure to take place, to give the defense a chance to find out what the patient's treating doctor has to say, prior to trial.

Medical Malpractice - Your Case Is On The Trial Calendar - Can Defense Lawyers Talk to Your Doctor?Halo: Reach - Achievement HORSE #13 (RADICAL Jack vs. GNARLY Geoff) Tube. Duration : 8.75 Mins.


Jack and Geoff square off in this battle to see who will re-take the lead in overall HORSE score. Who will win? Find out now! All maps are available at tinyurl.com

Keywords: Achievement, Hunter, HORSE, Halo, Reach, Bungie, Microsoft, Xbox, Jack, vs, Geoff, Smells, Really, awesome, fails, of, the, weak

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. See Gerry's website at http://www.oginski-law.com

Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry's free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

My Links : portable generator review Settlers Of Catan Seafarers pleural mesothelioma

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Medical negligence, doctor errors, surgical errors

www.hsinjurylaw.com - We get daily calls to ask whether a customer has a case for medical malpractice by a doctor or surgical mistakes, mistakes. We ask for three things: (1) Did the doctor or hospital did something wrong, that a breach of the standard of care? (2) you have a catastrophic damage from this injury? (3). Is there a connection between these two things? Contact Shapiro, Cooper Lewis & Appleton at 1-800-752-0042 to discuss your potential claim with a real lawyer for free.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bbzFoIU0Io&hl=en

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Malpractice Laws - Are They Destroying Patient & Doctor Communication?

Have you ever noticed that doctors, dentists, accountants, financial planners and other professionals are being so careful with what they say these days that you almost cannot get them to answer your questions?

Worse, they often do not answer your question with a straight answer. Do you know why this happens so often these days? Well, it's because they are fearful that they might lose their license or be sued for errors and omission, negligence or malpractice.
 
It appears that all the rules and regulations that have been put into place to protect the consumer, customer, client and/or patient are actually now harming them, due to the fact that communication is so aloof.
 
When you talk to a professional practitioner these days the clients and patients often feel as if they are asking a question of a politician during a live televised debate, as they will not answer your direct question, but instead give you all the pre-approved jargon.
 
Patients deserve more than a song and dance and when you have hired a professional you should be able to ask them questions without them worrying that you are going to sue them or misunderstand what they say and file a complaint with some government licensing board.  
 
When the doctors and professionals see their patients as potential adversaries, one can see that the communication has completely broken down and thus, the caring, empathy and service is out the window.
 
It is a disease that plagues our society and creates paranoia and fear between client and professional. This is why many say we need to relook at our malpractice laws in America. Please consider this.




"Lance Winslow" - Lance Winslow's Bio. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

SUE THE DOCTOR AND WIN! Medical malpractice judgments, settlements and experts

AS SEEN ON TV - Sue the Doctor and Win! A victim Guide to Winning Medical Malpractice claims. A book for all those effected by medical malpractice or medical error.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9832lAsAX7o&hl=en

Monday, March 8, 2010

Doctor Not Board Certified - Is He More Likely to Commit Malpractice?

The answer is "No."

There are plenty of board 'eligible' doctors that are excellent at what they do.
There are plenty of board certified doctors that are excellent at what they do.

On the other hand, there are a handful of doctors who are board eligible and doctors who are board certified who may be 'educationally challenged'.

Just because a doctor is not board certified does not, by itself, mean that something was done wrong if you suffered harm by a doctor or hospital.

Board certification is the highest certification a doctor can achieve in their specialty. It means they have the basic foundation for their specialty and have obtained all the pre-requisites needed in order to sit for and take the national exam. In most specialty board exams, there is usually a written part and an oral component as well.

Many doctors who have finished their residency training are required to wait two years in order to accumulate enough experience in order to sit for their oral exams.

A doctor who has taken their board examination and fails, remains 'board eligible' and can retake the exams at a later date. When a doctor has taken the exam multiple times and has been unable to successfully pass the exam, that information may raise a red flag to an attorney who represents an injured victim while under this doctor's care.

To answer the question raised in the title:

The fact that a doctor is board eligible and is not board certified does not mean, in and of itself, that the doctor is deficient or departed from good medical care. A detailed review of the facts might confirm that the physician did not have the knowledge necessary to properly treat a particular patient. That is why each case is different and requires a full and thorough evaluation of the patient's records. In New York, we are also required to have a medical expert confirm that (1) there was wrongdoing; (2) that the wrongdoing caused injury; and (3) that the injury is significant and/or permanent.




Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney. His video blog can be found at http://nymedicalmalpracticevideoblog.com where he offers free educational video tips to explain how lawsuits work in New York. You are encouraged to explore Gerry's popular website, http://www.oginski-law.com. Read his free special reports & books on malpractice and accident law. We have over 250 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. For more information, call him personally at 516-487-8207.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

3 Things To Know When You Cross-Examine a Doctor at Trial

Your client has accused a prominent doctor of malpractice. Her case goes to trial, and your first witness is the well-respected doctor. How do you cross-examine him?

1. Learn as much medicine as possible that's involved in the case.

You have to be a mini-expert on the medicine before ever getting up in Court to question the doctor. Read medical textbooks, medical literature, and use other physicians as experts to teach you the medicine.

2. Ask only leading direct questions.

You must keep a tight leash on any witness whom you cross-examine. If you ask an open-ended question ("Tell us why the patient bled to death Doctor...") you will suffer the dire consequences of a 10 minute lecture to the jury by this medical witness. Big mistake. You don't want the jury to see how educated and wonderful this physician is. You want them to see how he answers YOUR questions.

"You operated on Mrs. Jones 1 year ago?"

"You perforated her aorta while examining her nose?"

"The patient bled to death as a result of that puncture, correct?"

"Good medical practice dictates that when doing this procedure you should stay away from the aorta, correct?"

"The aorta is not in the surgical field, right?"

Do not ask "So how is it that you ruptured the aorta while doing this procedure?" (That's an open ended question.) Instead ask "Did you expect to puncutre the aorta during this procedure?" "What steps did you take to make sure the puncture did not occur?" ...and on it goes.

3. Do not ask a question when you don't know the answer!

During the course of a lawsuit you will have plenty of opportunity to learn everything about what happened. In New York, this is called the discovery phase of the lawsuit. If you are at trial, and do not know the answer to a specific question, I strongly suggest you NOT ask the question, unless the answer will absolutely not harm you or your case. Remember, you never know what will come out of the witnesses mouth.

Here's a great example. A dispute arises between two men in a park. It's twilight. A scream is heard, and a witness to the scream turns and sees two men standing near each other. One man's nose is gone and his face is bleeding profusely. The other man is just standing there.

On the witness stand, the defense attorney asks the witness whether he actually saw his client bite the man's nose off. The witness replies "No. I didn't."

"Then you're not sure my client was the one who bit his nose off?"

"Oh, I'm sure alright. It was your client."

"Really? How can you be so sure?" asks the defense attorney.

"Because I saw your client spit out the man's nose from his mouth!"

Cross-examination of a doctor is not easy. Experience is the key and learning all the medicine possible helps frame your questions.




Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Medical Malpractice - 10 Reasons Why You Shouldn't Sue Your Doctor

1. You like your doctor

So, what's wrong with that? Nothing. Most of us like our doctors. That's why we trust them and keep going back to them for treatment. But should the fact that you like your doctor prevent you from seeking compensation when he or she committed wrongdoing that caused you physical and emotional injury?

The law in New York permits anyone who has been injured by another to bring a lawsuit for compensation. This law originated from common law and goes back hundreds of years. In fact in some religions there is evidence that this type of law goes back thousands of years. It makes good common sense. If another person causes you harm, you are entitled to obtain money to pay for your medical expenses, your lost earnings, your future lost earnings, the damage to your property, and of course, compensation for the pain and suffering you endured.

So, should the fact that you like your doctor prevent you from bringing a lawsuit? It might make you feel uncomfortable, but I guarantee that when you start to think about your disabling injuries and how your doctor caused them, the anger and hostility you feel will usually outweigh your fondness for your doctor.

2. What good will the money do for you?

This is a common rhetorical question that defense attorneys often ask plaintiff's lawyers. "The money won't bring your loved one back," "The money won't make you whole again," "The money you're asking for isn't going to change anything..."

However, money is the only thing that our justice system allows us to recover when an injured victim sues their wrongdoer. While those comments above may all be true, we are prohibited from taking justice into our own hands. Therefore, what else can we obtain for the injured victim? Money is the only thing that allows us to pay the medical bills that were generated as a result of the wrongdoing. Money is going to make the victim more financially secure. Money will help the injured victim with ongoing medical care and rehabilitation. The injured victim will not be a burden on a City or governmental handout. Money will help his children go to school or camp. Money may help with modifications needed in his home- such as a wheelchair ramp or modified kitchen appliances.

Money can never make us whole, or replace the agony and suffering that was caused by a doctor or a hospital. But the money is supposed to make those wrongdoers think twice about doing that same action again, and hopefully prevent the next person from being a malpractice victim.

3. Your doctor's reputation will be tarnished

Contrary to popular opinion, (or at least from the doctor's insurance company) this is not an accurate statement. Most people living in a civilized society recognize the right to sue. The fact that a doctor has been or is sued is not that significant. If you ask a doctor if they've been sued, they will often be quick to explain how the case had no merit. Importantly, the physician will still continue to practice medicine and there will usually be no disciplinary action taken as a result of a civil medical malpractice lawsuit. The belief that a doctor's reputation will suffer a blemish if sued, is simply not correct.

4. Your doctor will be banished from his community

Once again, this statement is not true. The doctor will continue to practice medicine (even if they lose the malpractice suit against them, and are required to pay the injured victim money). The doctor will not lose their license, and in all probability, the award will not be reported in the local papers, and most of his patients won't even know of the lawsuit or the award.

5. Your doctor will shut his medical practice

No he won't. He might be outraged that he has to defend a lawsuit and take time away from his practice for a few days, but there is no reason for him to shut his medical practice.

In very extreme cases where the physician is a threat to the health and well-being of his patients, the New York State Department of Health can and will shut down the doctor's practice and revoke his license to practice.

But, in the majority of cases, this does not happen, and the doctor continues on with his practice and his life.

6. Your doctor may lose his license

Not true. A civil lawsuit in New York has no effect on whether a doctor does or does not lose his license to practice medicine. In order for a New York doctor to lose his license, the New York State Department of Health investigates a complaint of wrongdoing. After extensive investigation and after a hearing where the physician gets to explain what happened and why, the Department of Health reaches their own conclusions about whether treatment was rendered in accordance with good medical care or whether there were deficiencies.

The options to punish or cure the deficiencies are many, and only as the most extreme- and last resort option would the Health Department revoke a physician's license. But simply by bringing a lawsuit against a physician for monetary compensation does not affect his license to practice medicine.

7. Your doctor may alter your records

Believe it or not, this has been known to occur in rare instances. When it does, the attorney representing you may be able to prove it. If your lawyer is able to prove that your doctor altered your records, the doctor could suffer significant penalties and could lose his license to practice medicine. The fact that he may or may not alter your records should not prevent you from investigating and/or pursuing an action on your behalf. There are usually other ways to determine what treatment was rendered, and often such action by a doctor can help your case by showing the extent to which the doctor tried to cover up the wrongdoing.

8. Your doctor may apologize and tell you it was all a mistake

There are recent medical and insurance studies that have confirmed that when doctors and hospital staff are straightforward and honest about what happened, patients and their families tend to understand that 'not everyone is perfect'. In fact, some hospitals encourage the doctors to fess-up and tell the patients they screwed up, and apologize, and arrange to have the hospital immediately reconcile financially with the patient and his family. The studies indicate this works.

Does that mean that you shouldn't sue because the doctor apologized? Not necessarily. An apology may not solve your problems. You need to decide whether such an apology is sufficient. Most people will tell you it's not.

9. Your friends and family may think you're a gold-digger

If you live your life concerned about what your friends and family think, then maybe you shouldn't sue-under any circumstance. Your friends have not experienced what you have gone through. Nor do they live with the constant pain and disability that you have. They may not truly understand what you will live with for the rest of your life.

Some folks simply don't want their friends and family to know they're involved in a lawsuit. The reasons are endless. "I don't want anyone knowing my business." "I don't want my neighbors knowing how much of an award I received." "I don't want my family members asking me for money- this is for my future- I can't work anymore, and I can't afford to give it away." "I don't want my relatives to argue with me about why I sued my doctor."

You must decide for yourself whether these concerns outweigh your legal right to bring suit and recover money for your injuries.

10. Your injuries aren't that disabling

There are cases where the injuries are significant, but have cleared up after many months or years. The fact that you may no longer be permanently disabled is a factor to determine how much your case is worth. If you are no longer disabled- we congratulate you and your success in overcoming your injuries. If you can do those activities that you used to do, we are extremely pleased with your recovery. You should know however, that such success means that the value of your case may be limited to the time you were injured and disabled. Most people would agree with this result. You only can receive compensation for the time you were injured and disabled.

Many injured folks may make a recovery, but still be unable to do all of those daily life activities they used to do. Where there is an ongoing problem or disability, the value of your case is generally greater than where you have totally healed.




Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you.
oginski-law.com
516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Breast Cancer Survivors - Do You Really Think Your Doctor Misdiagnosed Your Cancer?

Breast cancer is deadly. Just ask any woman. Evidence of breast cancer clusters are becoming more common especially in New York and Long Island. Mammograms, gynecology visits, breast exams, biopsies and diagnostic tests are all designed to detect and track changes in a woman's breast.

As a lawyer who has represented injured victims for over 19 years in the State of New York, I'm going to give you 15 questions you should ask yourself if you've been diagnosed with breast cancer.

1. Did you have any symptoms with your breasts to suggest there might be a problem?

2. If you had noticed a problem such as a lump or discharge from your nipple, how long did it exist before you went to the doctor?

3. Do you regularly do breast exams on yourself- the way your gynecologist showed you how to do it?

4. When you first went to a doctor with your breast complaint, what did the doctor do about it?

5. What questions did the doctor ask about how long the condition existed, or whether you noticed it getting bigger or changing?

6. Did the doctor do a breast exam while you were sitting up, and also while lying down?

7. Was a mammogram ordered and done?

8. Was a needle biopsy done?

9. Was a CAT scan, MRI scan or x-ray done?

10. What were the results of the tests you had done?

11. Did your doctor tell you there was a chance the tests were "false negative" or "false positive" suggesting they might not be accurate?

12. If you were diagnosed with breast cancer, what type of cancer was it? Slow growing, fast growing?

13. If the cancer was diagnosed earlier, what treatment would you have received compared to the treatment you actually got?

14. Because of a delay in diagnosing your cancer, has your life expectancy changed significantly, compared to what it would have been if it had been detected when you first presented to your doctor with your breast complaints.

15. What treatment do you need now, and what stage is your breast cancer? Has it spread to other parts of your body?

By answering these questions, you'll have a better understanding of what a lawyer looks for when you ask yourself whether your doctor misdiagnosed your breast cancer. A key aspect of failure to diagnose breast cancer cases involve the question of what would have been done differently had you been timely diagnosed?

As you probably know, treatment for breast cancer ranges from surgical excision of a local cancer to mastectomy, where the entire breast is removed. When mastectomy is done, reconstruction and revision is often done at the same time. Radiation and chemotherapy are also common treatments that have significant side effects. As always, ask your treating doctor which treatments are best for you. After that, ask an experienced attorney whether your breast cancer should or could have been detected earlier and whether your treatment and outcome would have been different.




Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry's website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there's something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry's FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com